A peer-driven community-based doctoral supervisory model

dc.contributor.author	Hunt, Jane A.	en
dc.contributor.author	Swallow, Veronica	en
dc.date.accessioned	2014-07-20T20:18:29Z
dc.date.available	2014-07-20T20:18:29Z
dc.date.issued	2014-07-20
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11400/1490
dc.rights	Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/	*
dc.source	www.hsj.gr	en
dc.subject	Medical personnel
dc.subject	Ιατρική επίβλεψη
dc.subject	Ιατρικό προσωπικό
dc.subject	Παιδιά
dc.subject	Ηθική έρευνα
dc.subject	Doctoral supervision
dc.subject	Community-based peer learning
dc.subject	Ethical research with children
dc.title	A peer-driven community-based doctoral supervisory model	en
heal.type	journalArticle
heal.secondaryTitle	development from an evaluation of an ethics workshop for health care professionals undertaking research with children	en
heal.generalDescription	Review article	en
heal.classification	Primary care (Medicine)
heal.classification	Ιατρική
heal.classification	Νοσηλευτική
heal.classificationURI	http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh92006808
heal.classificationURI	N/A-Ιατρική
heal.classificationURI	N/A-Νοσηλευτική
heal.keywordURI	http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85082982
heal.language	en
heal.access	free
heal.recordProvider	Τεχνολογικό Εκπαιδευτικό Ίδρυμα Αθήνας.Σχολή Επαγγελμάτων Υγείας και Πρόνοιας. Τμήμα Νοσηλευτικής	el
heal.publicationDate	2014-04
heal.bibliographicCitation	Hunt, J. & Swallow, V. (April 2014). A peer-driven community-based doctoral supervisory model: development from an evaluation of an ethics workshop for health care professionals undertaking research with children. “Health Science Journal”. 8(2):154-165.	en
heal.abstract	Background: Differing doctoral supervision models currently exist. Three key conceptual supervisory models relevant to doctoral students from within the healthcare professions were identified from a literature review: the ‘functional pre-modern’ model, the ‘team’ model and the ‘community group’ model. However, whilst these models exist, for the most part, supervision remains embedded within home academic institutions. Method and material: (1) An extensive review of the literature was undertaken, drawing on: Australian Education Index, British Education Index, the British Humanities Index, the British Nursing Index, EBSCOHOST EJS and Google™ Scholar; (2) an outcome-oriented evaluation of a workshop delivered to seven current or prospective doctoral candidates from within the health care professions and researching with children and/or young people, concerning the conduct of ethical research was undertaken Results: Five key categories related to ‘best things about the day’ were identified from a four-item, anonymous questionnaire appraising the day. These concerned: round table discussions, plenary seminars, workshop organisation, value of experiential learning and future workshop opportunities. From these themes an ‘innovative’ peer-driven, community based model of doctoral supervision was developed that is extrinsic to and complements the supervision provided in students’ home academic institutions. Conclusions: The innovative supervisory model developed through an outcome-oriented evaluation of a workshop for doctoral candidates has particular relevance for doctoral students who are healthcare professionals generally and nurses in particular, especially those studying in highly specialised areas where there may be a dearth of subject specific supervisors.	en
heal.publisher	Μαρβάκη, Χριστίνα	el
heal.journalName	Health Science Journal	en
heal.journalType	peer-reviewed
heal.fullTextAvailability	true