Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.contributor.author Παναγάκης, Παναγιώτης el
dc.contributor.author Αξαόπουλος, Πέτρος Ι. el
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-07T19:07:23Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-07T19:07:23Z
dc.date.issued 2015-01-07
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11400/3499
dc.rights Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ *
dc.source http://www.elsevier.com el
dc.subject Pig
dc.subject Heat-stress indices
dc.subject Γουρούνι
dc.subject Θερμική καταπόνηση
dc.title Comparing fogging strategies for pig rearing using simulations to determine apparent heat-stress indices en
heal.type journalArticle
heal.classification Agriculture
heal.classification Livestock
heal.classification Γεωργία
heal.classification Κτηνοτροφία
heal.classificationURI http://skos.um.es/unescothes/C00112
heal.classificationURI http://skos.um.es/unescothes/C02327
heal.classificationURI **N/A**-Γεωργία
heal.classificationURI **N/A**-Κτηνοτροφία
heal.identifier.secondary doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.10.007
heal.language en
heal.access free
heal.recordProvider Τ.Ε.Ι. Αθήνας. Σχολή Τεχνολογικών Εφαρμογών. Τμήμα Μηχανικών Ενεργειακής Τεχνολογίας Τ.Ε. el
heal.publicationDate 2008
heal.bibliographicCitation Panagakis, P and Axaopoulos, P. (January 2008). Comparing fogging strategies for pig rearing using simulations to determine apparent heat-stress indices. Biosystems engineering. 99 (1). Elsevier Science Ltd. pp. 112-118. Anailable from: http://www.sciencedirect.com [Accessed 26/11/2007] el
heal.abstract Strategies to reduce the apparent heat-stress indices inside a growing pig building were compared. Two fogging strategies were studied, fogging with the necessary water evaporating to give the same: (i) duration of heat-stress, ‘FDuration’, and (ii) intensity of heat-stress, ‘FIntensity’, as when using evaporative pads, ‘EPads’. For the whole 5-month period (May–September) under Greek summer conditions strategy ‘FIntensity’ was significantly better than strategy ‘FDuration’ in terms of heat-stress duration (Po0.05; reduction 45.1%) and heat-stress intensity (Po0.01; reduction 70.7%). Also, during the hottest day (Julian 176) it resulted in: (i) a lower daily average inside temperature (28.5 vs. 31.8 1C; reduction 10.4%), (ii) a smaller daily inside dry-bulb temperature variation (8.7 vs. 10.3 1C; reduction 15.5%) and (iii) a higher reduction of peak outside temperature (36.8 1C at 14:00 h), namely 2.9 vs. 0.2 1C, respectively. For both strategies and heat-stress indices July was the most stressful month and May the mildest. In areas characterised by high outside temperatures and scarce water resources strategy ‘FIntensity’ should be implemented with caution as larger water quantities, in comparison to strategy ‘FDuration’, need to evaporate. en
heal.publisher Elsevier Science Ltd en
heal.journalName Biosystems engineering el
heal.journalType peer-reviewed
heal.fullTextAvailability true


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

Οι παρακάτω άδειες σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο:

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Εκτός από όπου ορίζεται κάτι διαφορετικό, αυτή η άδεια περιγράφεται ως Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες