Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

dc.contributor.author Schel, A. J. en
dc.contributor.author Marsh, P. D. en
dc.contributor.author Bradshaw, D. J. en
dc.contributor.author Finney, M. en
dc.contributor.author Fulford, M. R. en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-01T23:02:16Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-01T23:02:16Z
dc.date.issued 2015-05-02
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11400/9446
dc.rights Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ *
dc.source http://aem.asm.org/content/72/2/1380.full en
dc.subject σύγκριση
dc.subject Απολυμαντικά
dc.subject μικροβιακή μόλυνση
dc.subject Οδοντιατρική Μονάδα
dc.subject Συστήματα Νερού
dc.subject Ευρωπαϊκή Ένωση
dc.subject Comparison
dc.subject disinfectants
dc.subject microbial contamination
dc.subject Dental Unit
dc.subject Water Systems
dc.subject European Union
dc.title Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European union en
heal.type journalArticle
heal.classification Public health
heal.classification Δημόσια υγεία
heal.classification Microbiology
heal.classification Μικροβιολογία
heal.classificationURI http://lod.nal.usda.gov/28292
heal.classificationURI **N/A**-Δημόσια υγεία
heal.classificationURI http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh00005932
heal.classificationURI **N/A**-Μικροβιολογία
heal.keywordURI http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh99005286
heal.keywordURI http://lod.nal.usda.gov/221
heal.keywordURI http://lod.nal.usda.gov/15127
heal.contributorName Frandsen, E. en
heal.contributorName Østergaard, E. en
heal.contributorName Cate, J. M. en
heal.contributorName Moorer, W. R. en
heal.contributorName Μαυρίδου, Αθηνά el
heal.contributorName Καμμά, Ιωάννα el
heal.contributorName Μανδηλαρά, Ιωάννα el
heal.contributorName Stosser, L. en
heal.contributorName Kneist, S. en
heal.contributorName Araujo, R. en
heal.contributorName Contreras, N. en
heal.contributorName Goroncy-Bermes, P. en
heal.contributorName O’Mullane, D. en
heal.contributorName Burke, F. en
heal.contributorName O’Reilly, P. en
heal.contributorName Hourigan, G. en
heal.contributorName O’Sullivan, M. en
heal.contributorName Holman, R. el
heal.contributorName Walker, J. T. en
heal.identifier.secondary DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1380-1387.2006
heal.language en
heal.access campus
heal.recordProvider Τεχνολογικό Εκπαιδευτικό Ίδρυμα Αθήνας. Σχολή Επαγγελμάτων Υγείας και Πρόνοιας. Τμήμα Ιατρικών Εργαστηρίων el
heal.publicationDate 2006
heal.bibliographicCitation Schel, A. J., Marsh, P. D., Bradshaw, D. J., Finney, M., Fulford, M. R. et al. (2006) Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European union. "Applied and Environmental Microbiology". [Online] 72 (2), p.1380-1387. Available from: http://aem.asm.org [Accessed 01/05/2015] en
heal.abstract Water delivered by dental unit water systems (DUWS) in general dental practices can harbor high numbers of bacteria, including opportunistic pathogens. Biofilms on tubing within DUWS provide a reservoir for microorganisms and should be controlled. This study compared disinfection products for their ability to meet the American Dental Association's guideline of <200 CFU · ml−1 for DUWS water. Alpron, BioBlue, Dentosept, Oxygenal, Sanosil, Sterilex Ultra, and Ster4Spray were tested in DUWS (n = 134) in Denmark, Germany, Greece, Ireland, The Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Weekly water samples were tested for total viable counts (TVCs) on yeast extract agar, and, where possible, the effects of products on established biofilm (TVCs) were measured. A 4- to 5-week baseline measurement period was followed by 6 to 8 weeks of disinfection (intermittent or continuous product application). DUWS water TVCs before disinfection ranged from 0 to 5.41 log CFU · ml−1. Disinfectants achieved reductions in the median water TVC ranging from 0.69 (Ster4Spray) to 3.11 (Dentosept) log CFU · ml−1, although occasional high values (up to 4.88 log CFU · ml−1) occurred with all products. Before treatment, 64% of all baseline samples exceeded American Dental Association guidelines, compared to only 17% following commencement of treatment; where tested, biofilm TVCs were reduced to below detectable levels. The antimicrobial efficacies of products varied (e.g., 91% of water samples from DUWS treated with Dentosept or Oxygenal met American Dental Association guidelines, compared to 60% of those treated with Ster4Spray). Overall, the continuously applied products performed better than those applied intermittently. The most effective products were Dentosept and Oxygenal, although Dentosept gave the most consistent and sustained antimicrobial effect over time. en
heal.journalName Applied and Environmental Microbiology en
heal.journalType peer-reviewed
heal.fullTextAvailability true


Αρχεία σε αυτό το τεκμήριο

  • Όνομα: Appl. Environ. Microbiol.-2006 ...
    Μέγεθος: 219.1Kb
    Μορφότυπο: PDF

Οι παρακάτω άδειες σχετίζονται με αυτό το τεκμήριο:

Εμφάνιση απλής εγγραφής

Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Εκτός από όπου ορίζεται κάτι διαφορετικό, αυτή η άδεια περιγράφεται ως Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες